No . 2013 - 05 Daniele Nosenzo , Simone Quercia and Martin Sefton
نویسندگان
چکیده
We study the effect of group size on cooperation in voluntary contribution mechanism games. As in previous experiments, we study fourand eight-person groups in high and low marginal per capita return (MPCR) conditions. We find a positive effect of group size in the low MPCR condition, as in previous experiments. However, in the high MPCR condition we observe a negative group size effect. We extend the design to investigate twoand threeperson groups in the high MPCR condition, and find that cooperation is highest of all in twoperson groups. The findings in the high MPCR condition are consistent with those from nperson prisoner’s dilemma and oligopoly experiments that suggest it is more difficult to sustain cooperation in larger groups. The findings from the low MPCR condition suggest that this effect can be overridden. In particular, when cooperation is low other factors, such as considerations of the social benefits of contributing (which increase with group size), may dominate any negative group size effect.
منابع مشابه
Sequential vs. simultaneous contributions to public goods: Experimental evidence
Article history: Received 18 March 2009 Received in revised form 11 September 2009 Accepted 2 March 2010 Available online 7 March 2010 JEL classifications: C92 D03 H41
متن کاملDaniele Nosenzo , Theo Offerman , Martin Sefton and Ailko van der Veen August 2012 Discretionary Sanctions and Rewards
We experimentally investigate a repeated “inspection game” where, in the stage game, an employee can either work or shirk and an employer simultaneously chooses to inspect or not inspect. Combined payoffs are maximized when the employee works and the employer does not inspect. However, the unique equilibrium of the stage game is in mixed strategies with positive probabilities of shirking/inspec...
متن کاملPeer Effects and Social Preferences in Voluntary Cooperation
Substantial evidence suggests the behavioral relevance of social preferences and also the importance of social influence effects (“peer effects”). Yet, little is known about how peer effects and social preferences are related. In a three-person gift-exchange experiment we find causal evidence for peer effects in voluntary cooperation: agents’ efforts are positively related despite the absence o...
متن کاملPeer Effects in Pro-Social Behavior: Social Norms or Social Preferences?
We compare social preference and social norm based explanations for peer effects in a three-person gift-exchange experiment. In the experiment a principal pays a wage to each of two agents, who then make effort choices sequentially. In our baseline treatment we observe that the second agent's effort is influenced by the effort choice of the first agent, even though there are no material spillov...
متن کاملThe Impact of Social Comparisons on Reciprocity
In this paper, we investigate how social comparison information about referent others (i.e., learning what similar others do, and how they are treated) affects reciprocal relationships. Using three-person gift-exchange games, we study how employees’ reciprocity towards an employer is affected by pay comparison information (what co-workers earn) and effort comparison information (how co-workers ...
متن کامل